Ingesting GitHub + Jira + Figma

Find the bottleneck on your terms.

Daily standups, historical scorecards, and rule-fired alerts - built from your team's real GitHub, Jira, and Figma activity. You define what "stuck" means. We surface it before it bites.

Read the methodology ->

Problem

Does this sound familiar?

Scene 01

Your 9am standup: three people disagree on what happened yesterday.

status meeting | no shared record
Scene 02

PR-421 has been in review for eight days; nobody knows it's blocked.

pull request | silent queue
Scene 03

Someone asks how the team is doing. You have vibes, not an answer.

leadership update | weak signal

Morning scorecard

By 5:47 AM, your team already knows.

A morning scorecard built from yesterday's real activity. Engineers, rule triggers, credits earned, team total.

Engineering scorecard - Tue Apr 25 - 05:47 AM - Sample teamTeam net+38
RZReza Z.Approved 3 PRs within 4h - Merged feat/billing-rules - 142 lines+14credits
PRPriya R.Closed PAY-8821 matching merged PR - Reviewed PR #4254+6credits
SKSara K.Merged 2 PRs under 200 lines - Reviewed PR #4310 in 3h+13credits
LPLiam P.Rule fired: no reviews in 2 days - No merges yesterday-10credits
EHEli H.Reopened MOBILE-2391 within 24h - Late review on PR #4198-13credits
WTWendy T.3 design comments on Auth Flow v3 - Resolved 4 feedback threads+0design
github + jira + figma-rules: standupbomb-default-v1

Sample scorecard

Rules

You define "good." The scorecard follows.

A handful of starter rules. Yours can override, replace, or extend them - the engine doesn't care what framework you brought.

01Review a teammate's PR within 4 business hours.+10
02PR merged under 200 lines.+5
03Review within 4h of request.+3
04Ticket reopened within 7 days.-10
05Close a ticket matching a merged PR.+3

Your team, your rules - not someone else's framework.

Unified signal

One view. Every tool your team uses.

Other tools see only their slice of the work. We stitch the slices together - into your scorecard, by your rules.

GitHubJiraFigmaStandupBombengine - your rulesYour team'sscorecardDAILY - HISTORICAL
Competitor

Geekbot

Async text interview, one channel of truth.

Competitor

LinearB / Jellyfish

Opinionated framework, enterprise-priced.

Our approach

StandupBomb

Unified signal, scored by your rules.

Methodology

Metrics like these, tracked across every tool.

Three families of signal we know how to read. Yours can subtract any of them, or add new ones.

flow
Flow
how fast work moves through your team
PR lifetimecreated to merged, p50 / p90, per author and per repogithub
Review latencyPR opened to first review, business-hours; rule-fired alert when over thresholdgithub
Lead time for changefirst commit to production deploy, or merge to default if no deploy hookgithub
Deploy frequencydeploys per week; healthy band defined by your team's rulegithub
Change failure rate% of deploys followed by rollback / hotfix within 24hgithub
credit
Credit
net signal from your rules - daily and historical
Daily team netsum of all rule-fired credits minus deductions for the dayrules
Weekly net trend7-day rolling, with previous-week comparison; sparkline in scorecardrules
Per-engineer creditsindividual ledger; spotlight engineers with consistent positive or negative deltasrules
Rule-fired countshow often each rule triggers; reveals dormant rules and over-tuned onesrules
Rule-coverage %share of measured events that matched a rule; low coverage means rules need expansionrules
behavior
Behavior
patterns across people and tools, not just code
Stale-PR rate% of open PRs older than your rule's threshold; surfaces silently-blocked workgithub
Reopen ratetickets reopened within 7 days; signal of premature closejira
Ticket-PR fidelity% of merged PRs matched to closed tickets within 24hgithub + jira
Design-review activitycomments and resolutions on Figma files in active sprintsfigma
Cross-tool coverageengineers active in more than 1 tool yesterday; signals where work actually livesall

FAQ

Straight answers, even at this stage.

We'll edit these as we know more. No deflection.

When will it launch?
TBD. We're in stealth, ingesting against real teams privately. Email updates are the only commitment we can make today - if you're on the list, you'll hear before anyone else.
What does it cost?
TBD. We'll share pricing before we open up. No founder pricing, no grandfathering bait - when you can pay, you'll see the same number everyone else sees.
What data does it need?
Read access to your GitHub, Jira, and Figma activity. We don't need source code. No keystroke capture, no screen recording, no email contents. Privacy and retention will be documented before we open access.
Does it replace Geekbot or LinearB?
Conceptually yes - we replace the morning standup and the team scorecard. Practically: timing TBD. Geekbot is a chat interview; LinearB is an enterprise framework. We sit between them with your rules, not theirs.
What integrations do you support at v0?
GitHub, Jira, Figma. More planned (Slack, Linear, GitLab) - we'll roadmap them once we have customers asking. Tell us what you need; the list moves.
Will there be a self-host option?
On the roadmap. Compliance-heavy teams need it; we've heard you. v0 is hosted-only. We'll publish architecture and dependency posture before self-host ships.
Who's building this?
A small team that ran engineering at organisations where the morning standup was the most expensive recurring meeting on the calendar. We'll publish founder bios before launch.
Is this AI?
Where it's useful - summarising the day, surfacing what's stuck. The scoring engine is rules, not vibes. You see the rule that fired and the credit weight every time. No black-box leadership coaching.

When there's news, you'll hear first.

No spam. No drip campaign. We email when there's a real thing to say.

we'll only email when there's news